Memorandum

City of Lawrence

Police Department

 

To:     Diane Stoddard, Interim City Manager

From:  Tarik Khatib, Chief of Police

Cc:     Casey Toomay, Assistant City Manager

          Brandon McGuire, Assistant to the City Manager

Date:  October 23, 2015

Re:     Fireworks Enforcement

 

Background

On November 19, 2002, the City of Lawrence adopted Ordinance No. 7594 which amended the Uniform Fire Code as to the regulation of fireworks.  This prohibited the “use, possession, handling and sale of fireworks” within the City of Lawrence.  There were several exceptions which included official public displays as well as novelty type items as defined by the United States Department of Transportation.  Enforcement of the fireworks ban has been problematic in the ensuing years for a variety of reasons. 

 

Discussion

Response to a single firework nuisance call is fairly simple if an officer is able to identify the offender – fireworks are disposable, moving devices designed for single use which makes it easier to avoid detection than, for instance, a house party or stereo noise complaint. This is compounded when the complaint can be anywhere between 15 minutes to 99 minutes old (the maximum call hold time).   When an offender is identified, options include a warning, a warning with a confiscation of items, or a citation with a confiscation of items.  The time needed for identification of persons, confiscation of the items, and documentation/destruction (at a designated location at one of the fire stations as the fireworks cannot be safely stored in evidence) of the items requires at least 30 minutes for each instance.  This becomes an issue when there are multiple calls for service holding which is typically seen during the time period around the July 4th Holiday and especially on the day itself.  These calls include fights, domestic disturbances, alcohol offenses, and other volatile situations associated with individuals in a celebratory mood.  The Lawrence Police Department does additionally staff during this time period, however, these resources are usually absorbed into the handling of the increased “regular” call load.  The Department has also traditionally provided staffing to be present during the public displays and crowds gathered in the downtown/river levee area; for example:

 

·         2014 – Three officers and a supervisor were utilized at a cost of approximately $1,178.

 

·         2015 – Six officers and a supervisor were utilized at a cost of approximately $1,100.  Costs were less due to the reduced length of staffing time as well as the Douglas County Sheriff’s Office assisting with personnel.  Both were due to patrol staffing constraints.

 

Police response has included complaint based attention and self-initiated response when time allows.  Officers are instructed to handle violations in an efficient manner that would stop the violation yet would not result in calls going unanswered.  This involves discretion on the part of the officer with regard to the handling of fireworks calls.  Officers are to manage the call load in order to ensure there is an available officer to handle incoming calls.  Officers are not encouraged to engage in protracted actions which will remove themselves from service, or even tie up additional officers, for lengthy periods of time.  Voluntary compliance coupled with education is utilized prior to expending time processing an arrest through the issuance of a Notice To Appear (NTA).  Other considerations include:

 

·         Uncooperative individuals or repeat offenders are to be cited if possible. 

 

 

 

 

 

Data

In the table below are listed the fireworks related calls for the past eight years.  This only captures the time period around (June 30 – July 6) the 4th of July (when most of the calls are generated), as well as other calls believed to be fireworks related.

 

A hand search was conducted of the 2015 calls to determine call disposition; and this is likely representative of other years.  An overall breakdown is presented in the below chart.

A large percentage (49%) of the calls are classified as “10-77”.  This indicates that the officer was not able to confirm the fireworks call.  This would usually be the result of the officer being dispatched to the area after the call had been holding for some time and the reported activity was no longer taking place.  The calls that do not have a disposition (4%) can be a combination of no contact, not being able to confirm the complaint, or the officers simply handling the call without taking the radio air time to inform dispatch how the call was handled.

Recommendation

The Lawrence Police Department could certainly make a more concerted effort to enforce the fireworks ban.  This would likely require a dedication of significant resources to adequately address the volume of calls and would necessitate a deliberate refocusing of resources from other operational commitments.  This may also further the “catch-22” officers are placed in when attempting to enforce the ordinance.  Often, citizens point to others around them when an officer contacts them about a violation and they are quick to point out the abundance of firework stands adjacent to city streets at every main artery in and out of town.  Additional public awareness and cooperation with the County on the issues could be another avenue to pursue.  Location of the sale points farther away from the City or a County ban on fireworks sales may alleviate some of the confusion.