-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Soules
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 10:53 AM
To: Joanne Eckert
Subject: FW: [Fwd: Re: Bike Markings]

-----Original Message-----

From: Struckhoff, Eric Charles [mailto:ecs@ku.edu]

Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 11:45 PM

To: Charles Soules

Subject: RE: [Fwd: Re: Bike Markings]

Chuck,

The BAC unanimously recommends the use of the arrow markings for Naismith. Compared to signage, pavement markings create a higher visibility and thus greater awareness of the likelihood of cyclists on Naismith. BAC would also like to explore the use of these markings in other retrofit projects, including Lawrence Ave/Princeton area, as discussed previously. BAC plans to compile some examples of such installations, including cautionary signage where appropriate.

BAC further recommends a joint KU/city task force to coordinate development of bike facilities on and around KU campus, including but not limited to development of facilities shown on BFM, possible extension of Ousdahl north onto campus ROW established for that purpose, new signage/pavement markings and replacement of signage removed during recent road reconstructions, and study of design solutions for intersections like 19th/Naismith, Naismith/Sunnyside. (Of course, some of these are KU only, but will be affected by city planning.) Almost 10 years ago, Naismith was identified as a prime candidate corridor for bike improvements, and it's become clear that pedestrian facilities are needed, too. BAC feels that KU and city must work closely to anticipate redevelopment opportunties and to be prepared to establish such facilities as reconstruction progresses. Had KU been aware of city's plans before reconstructing Naismith a few years ago, Naismith might look much different between 19th and Sunnyside today.

Cheers,

Eric