| City of Lawrence | ||||||||
| Available Debt Service Funds | ||||||||
| With 2008 CIP Projects | ||||||||
| Assessed | Debt | Property Tax | Other | Debt | Net | Ending | ||
| Year | Value* | Levy** | Revenue | Revenue | Service*** | Income | Fund Balance | |
| 2000 | 498,663,930 | 6.71 | 3,668,190 | 929,170 | 4,800,085 | -202,725 | 7,947,026 | |
| 2001 | 545,451,921 | 6.75 | 4,051,274 | 806,224 | 5,165,537 | -308,039 | 7,638,987 | |
| 2002 | 593,159,174 | 7.12 | 4,366,170 | 1,140,000 | 6,137,522 | -631,352 | 7,007,635 | |
| 2003 | 629,033,427 | 7.13 | 4,410,000 | 2,744,000 | 6,624,510 | 529,490 | 7,537,125 | |
| 2004 | 674,353,182 | 7.10 | 4,700,233 | 2,089,000 | 6,029,126 | 760,107 | 8,297,233 | |
| 2005 | 718,149,570 | 7.07 | 4,978,998 | 1,955,000 | 7,461,061 | -527,063 | 7,770,169 | |
| 2006 | 776,860,997 | 7.05 | 5,310,303 | 1,280,000 | 7,069,376 | -479,073 | 7,291,096 | |
| 2007 | 824,365,924 | 7.01 | 5,765,441 | 2,781,261 | 8,101,223 | 445,479 | 7,736,575 | |
| 2008 | 853,590,988 | 7.01 | 5,923,836 | 995,000 | 7,898,410 | -979,574 | 6,757,001 | |
| 2009 | 853,590,988 | 7.01 | 5,923,836 | 950,000 | 8,076,381 | -1,202,545 | 5,554,456 | |
| 2010 | 870,662,808 | 7.01 | 6,042,313 | 930,000 | 8,160,206 | -1,187,893 | 4,366,564 | |
| 2011 | 888,076,064 | 7.01 | 6,038,651 | 890,000 | 7,637,092 | -708,441 | 3,658,123 | |
| 2012 | 905,837,585 | 7.01 | 6,286,422 | 890,000 | 8,206,271 | -1,029,848 | 2,628,274 | |
| 2013 | 923,954,337 | 7.50 | 6,860,361 | 890,000 | 8,500,410 | -750,049 | 1,878,225 | |
| * Assumes 2% growth in Assessed Value after 2009 | ||||||||
| ** Assumes a mill levy change in 2013 | ||||||||
| *** Assumes following CIP Budget- | ||||||||
| $3,400,000 in 2008; $6,500,000 in 2009, and $5,000,000 annually thereafter | ||||||||
| Above debt service is for at-large property tax debt only, not debt paid from other sources | ||||||||
| A fund balance is required to make up for any unpaid special assessments, avoid large | ||||||||
| changes in the levy, help cushion any unperceived slow downs in assessed valuation growth, | ||||||||
| and cover a possible disruption in property tax payments. | ||||||||