| Annual Budget |
|
|
|
| PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT DECISION PACKAGE |
|
|
| Fund |
Department |
Division |
Dept Rank |
City Rank[1] |
|
| 001 |
3000 |
570 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TYPE
OF PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT |
|
| DESCRIPTION
OF PROGRAM |
|
|
|
|
| EQUIPMENT
REPLACEMENT PROGRAM, 2007 & 2008 |
|
|
|
| As
presented to the City Manager last fall, the Street Division has a
significant amount of |
|
| equipment that greatly exceeds its Expected
Useful Life by industry standards. The
equipment |
|
| become
unreliable in responding to operational and emergency needs. Maintenance and |
|
| repair
costs escalate rapidly with aging equipment, creating inefficiencies. |
|
|
| The Street Division needs to replace the
following equipment, as outlined in memo attached: |
|
| *Paving
Equipment ( asphalt distributor ) 115,000 |
|
|
|
| ◘ Farm tractor (levee maintenance, levee
& runway mowing): 168,000 |
|
|
| ◘ Wheel loader and motor grader: 232,000 |
|
|
|
| ◘ Tandem axle truck, w/ plow and grader --
$110,000 |
|
|
|
| PLEASE
SEE DETAILS IN MEMO and EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ATTACHED |
|
| BENEFITS
OF FUNDING PROGRAM |
|
|
|
|
| ○ good dependable equipment is critical to
provding quality services, efficiently |
|
| ○ increased equipment
reliability and safety |
|
|
|
| ○ decreased maintenance
expenditures |
|
|
|
| ○ possibility of utilizing new technology to provide
services bettter and/or safer |
|
|
|
|
|
| ESTIMATE
AND EXPLANATION OF NEW REVENUE |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
no new revenue |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| CONSEQUENCES
OF NOT FUNDING PROGRAM |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| ○ high maintenance costs and unreliable equipment |
Continued high
maintenance cost and low reliability. |
|
|
| ○ potentially drastic cost increases if
purchase are deferred further in the progression |
|
| of emission standards changes |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| POSITIONS
INVOLVED IN PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
no positions |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year |
|
|
| FINANCING
OF PROGRAM |
Implementation |
Two year implementation
option |
|
|
FIRST YEAR |
first year |
second year |
|
| PERSONAL SERVICES |
|
|
|
|
| CONTRACTUAL SERVICES |
|
|
|
|
| COMMODITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
| CAPITAL
OUTLAY |
|
$
725,000 |
$
362,500 |
$
386,300 |
|
| TOTAL COST |
|
$ 725,000 |
$
362,500 |
$
386,300 |
|
| SAVINGS FROM FUNDING PKG. |
|
* 2 year implementation assumes |
|
| NET COST |
|
$ 725,000 |
a 5% inflation in year 2 of package |
|
| ANNUAL COST |
(IF DIFFERENT FROM NET) |
$ 725,000 |
|
|
| Annual Budget |
|
|
|
| PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT DECISION PACKAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
| PERSONAL
SERVICES |
|
| 10-01 |
Regular Salaries |
|
|
|
| 10-02 |
Overtime |
|
|
|
| 10-04 |
Longevity Pay |
|
|
|
| 10-04 |
Holiday Pay |
|
|
|
| 10-06 |
Part-time Salaries |
|
|
|
| 12-01 |
FICA |
|
|
|
| 12-02 |
Unemployment |
|
|
|
| 12-03 |
KPERS |
|
|
|
| 12-06 |
Life Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
$ - |
|
|
| CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
$ - |
|
|
| COMMODITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
$ - |
|
|
| CAPITAL
OUTLAY |
|
|
| |
ONE YEAR IMPLEMENTATION OPTION |
|
|
|
| |
60-08 |
$
725,000 |
ONE
YEAR IMPLEMENTATION |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Subtotal |
|
$ 725,000 |
|
| |
|
| TOTAL |
|
|
$
725,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| CAPITAL
OUTLAY |
|
|
| |
TWO YEAR IMPLEMENTATION OPTION |
|
|
|
| |
60-08 |
$
362,500 |
YEAR ONE |
|
| |
|
$
386,300 |
YEAR
TWO (5% inflation) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Subtotal |
|
$ 748,800 |
|
| |
|
| TOTAL |
|
|
$
748,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|