| Annual Budget | ||||
| PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT DECISION PACKAGE | ||||
| Fund | Department | Division | Dept Rank | City Rank[1] |
| 001 | 1070 | 557 | 1 | |
| TYPE OF PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT | ||||
| DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM | ||||
| DATA PROTECTION PROJECT | ||||
| This project would involve installing a data storage RAID at the City's Wastewater | ||||
| Treatment Plant to better protect the City's servers. A backup of each server | ||||
| would be instantly maintained at the 'bit' level, allowing any update of a database to | ||||
| automatically be updated at the remote site. This project would allow the City's email | ||||
| server, Court server, GIS server, Imaging server, Active Directory server and shared | ||||
| Citydata' server to have the data duplicated to a secure remote site to be maintained by | ||||
| Information Systems. The server replication process would be handled by NSI's | ||||
| "Double-Take" server replication and recovery option software. The Email server would | ||||
| be setup as a fail-over server that could immediately take over if the primary server had | ||||
| a problem. The other servers would replicate their server's data to a storage server | ||||
| to prevent data loss. | ||||
| BENEFITS OF FUNDING PROGRAM | ||||
| These are critical servers for the daily operations of the City of Lawrence and represent | ||||
| many thousands of employee hours in maintenance. This project would insure that critical | ||||
| data would always have an immediate backup available in case of a hardware malfunction | ||||
| on a critical server or loss of a building. | ||||
| ESTIMATE AND EXPLANATION OF NEW REVENUE | ||||
| None | ||||
| CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING PROGRAM | ||||
| Critical data would be less protected and more at risk of loss or corruption. | ||||
| The cost of this project far outways the value of the data represented on these servers. | ||||
| POSITIONS INVOLVED IN PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT | ||||
| Network Administrator, Information Systems Department. | ||||
| FINANCING OF PROGRAM | ||||
| FIRST YEAR | SECOND YEAR | THIRD YEAR | ||
| PERSONAL SERVICES | ||||
| CONTRACTUAL SERVICES | $ 2,000 | |||
| COMMODITIES | $ 24,948 | $ 4,455 | $ 4,455 | |
| CAPITAL OUTLAY | $ 9,500 | |||
| TOTAL COST | $ 36,448 | $ 4,455 | $ 4,455 | |
| SAVINGS FROM FUNDING PKG. | ||||
| NET COST | $ 36,448 | |||
| ANNUAL COST | (IF DIFFERENT FROM NET) | $ 36,448 | ||
| Annual Budget | ||||
| PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT DECISION PACKAGE | ||||
| PERSONAL SERVICES | ||||
| 10-01 | Regular Salaries | |||
| 10-02 | Overtime | |||
| 10-04 | Longevity Pay | |||
| 10-04 | Holiday Pay | |||
| 10-06 | Parttime Salaries | |||
| 12-01 | FICA | |||
| 12-02 | Unemployment | |||
| 12-03 | KPERS | |||
| 12-06 | Life Insurance | |||
| Subtotal | $ - | |||
| CONTRACTUAL SERVICES | ||||
| Integration Costs | $ 2,000 | |||
| Subtotal | $ 2,000 | |||
| COMMODITIES | ||||
| SERVER LICENSES: | ||||
| Email Server | $ 2,772 | |||
| Email Fail-over | $ 2,772 | |||
| Court Server | $ 2,772 | |||
| GIS Server | $ 2,772 | |||
| Imaging Server | $ 2,772 | |||
| CityData Server | $ 2,772 | |||
| Active Dir Server | $ 2,772 | |||
| Storage Server 1 | $ 2,772 | |||
| Storage Server 2 | $ 2,772 | |||
| Subtotal | $ 24,948 | |||
| CAPITAL OUTLAY | ||||
| Storage RAID | $ 9,500 | |||
| Subtotal | $ 9,500 | |||
| TOTAL | $ 36,448 | |||