Network
Fleet GPS Usage Review
Reviewed by Davis
McElwain
City Management
Intern
October 2012
|
|
BACKGROUND
In
2010, the City of Lawrence began purchasing and implementing Network Fleet, a
network-based GPS system to track vehicles throughout the city using GPS
signals and transmitting them using cellular phone tower technology. Currently
146 vehicles are equipped with the technology, varying from dump trucks, to
refuse trucks, to tractors, and even some supervisor vehicles. Supervisors and
managers have the ability to login to the network and view the last location
and speed of vehicles in about two-minute intervals, as well as monitor where
vehicles have been throughout the workday.
METHODOLOGY
In
order to better aggregate the 146 vehicles and their data, data for this report
were grouped by division and by supervisor responsibility for vehicle use.
Additionally, supervisor login statistics were grouped by department, which
resulted in four departments: Solid Waste, Street, Utilities, and Public Works
(Management). In order to better analyze the data, I have grouped the data by
these departments. Login data is not a foolproof metric for usage, as several
supervisors in public works have set up daily reports that are sent via email
that contain the information that they need to see, thus not necessitating a
login to the system.
DEPARTMENT USE
Departments
vary in how they use Network Fleet. Solid Waste Department uses it to track
refuse trucks and to optimize weekly routes. Utilities Department uses it to
locate teams if moving from one work site to another. Streets and Utilities
use it as a safety mechanism if severe weather is approaching. Public Works
even uses it in remote places such as the airport to monitor the tractor
operator. Many managers have used it to investigate citizen complaints about
speeding, misuse of city vehicles, and to monitor breaks while on the job.
CAPABILITIES to
SUSTAIN BASED ON INTERVIEWS
·
Geo-fences: Solid Waste uses geo-fences
well to monitor refuse truck routes and receive alerts when geo-fences are
crossed.
·
Reports: Public Works uses weekly
reports for its vehicles that are generated by the supervisor and reviewed
throughout the management chain up to the director. The report capability
allows supervisors to set up custom and recurring reports so that they do not
have to login daily to track their vehicles. This capability lets the
supervisor have a daily log of their crews’ usage for future study if needed. Also,
idle time of vehicles can be researched through the system; however, no managers
seem to be using this feature.
·
Route Tracing for Web Display: Streets
Department has the capability to map their snowplowed streets on a website, but
this capability has not been tested since last year’s snowfall was well below
average.
·
Complaint Investigation: Forensic
use to investigate complaints of speeding, looting by sanitation workers, or
excessive break time seems to give supervisors the facts with which to base an
investigation. However, several supervisors mentioned that initially the
system created some mistrust between employees and their supervisors.
CAPABILITIES TO
IMPROVE BASED ON INTERVIEWS
Supervisors
were generally satisfied if they know how to use the program. Supervisors who
did not receive training (some who just received a username and some who are
new to the City since the initial training took place) are generally not
pleased with the system. Yearly training class for new users and/or a
refresher course should be added in order to make sure the program is being used
to the fullest extent. I researched the answer to some of the questions that
these supervisors had about capabilities and shared it with them.
·
Multiple Vehicle Route Traces: One
manager commented that it would be nice if multiple vehicle route traces could
be viewed simultaneously. Since the system only “pings” about every two
minutes, it would not be a true route trace unless the city purchased
additional capability. Five vehicles is the maximum amount that can be tracked
on the multi-track map feature.
·
Driver Interface and Use in the Field:
Solid Waste would like to see an interface with the drivers to improve
communication in contingency routes and provide maps and directions for new
routes. Supervisors with smart phones can download the Network Fleet
application and see the real-time map on their phone. Only one manager
mentioned using it on their city-issued smart phone. I recommend that all city
employees with Network Fleet access download this application to monitor where
their employees are while they are moving around the city.
·
Technique-Sharing on Network Fleet: One
manager was frustrated because too many waypoints such as gas stations and
landmarks were clouding the map. I showed them how to remove those waypoints
and save those preferences. Technique-sharing amongst departments and yearly
training should solve this problem. Fuel efficiency and speed history are
capabilities that are available and would be beneficial to managers but are not
being used widely. Knowledge of the system does not appear to be uniform
across departments, so sharing of practical uses between departments should be
encouraged.
department user
trends BASED ON LOGINS and interviews
Solid
Waste: Solid Waste has the largest amount of Network Fleet systems
(59) and users and also has the most logins per month per user, including the
“Big Board” in the front reception of their building. The manager stated that
the big board has been instrumental in refuse truck drivers seeing what other
crews are doing when they walk into the office. It has helped to decrease the
perception that “I am the only one who is picking up everyone’s trash”.
Additionally, since Solid Waste has been so active with the system, the drivers
know that they are being monitored for efficiency throughout the day. Since
the crews cannot go home until all the routes are finished, the system has encouraged
a sense of teamwork to “get the job done”.
Streets:
Streets has a smaller group of systems (32) and users but the second highest
rate of login. The asphalt crew supervisor is the most active user since that
crew is generally moving around the most during the day. The street department
anticipates using the system more during snowplow season.
Utilities:
Utilities has many users and systems (34) for its department size since there
are many disparate jobs within the department. As such, the use is sporadic
within the department, but has been useful when the supervisor is knowledgeable
on the system. The water treatment plants have Network Fleet capability in
case the vehicle needs to drive to the intake to solve a problem with a water
source.
Public
Works: Public Works has sporadic use because it is generally a
collection of managers that have offices in city hall but their departments are
based throughout the city. There are 21 systems that fall under public works
managers (not including the streets and solid waste systems). Some are more
knowledgeable than others on the system, but all managers produce weekly
reports that are then forwarded to the director.
additional
comments
I
did not do a cost analysis of the system as I do not know the historical costs
and price structure. This could be an area for future analysis based on
feedback.
RECOMMENDATIONS
In
addition to the training mentioned above, there are several other departments
that could benefit from this technology. Code enforcement and inspection
personnel operate autonomously and often have unpleasant interaction with
citizens. Currently the managers have a general idea of the inspection
locations for the day, but may not know where their inspectors are at any one
time. Network Fleet could be used for safety in code enforcement. This would
only require a 7 or 8 GPS-unit addition to the fleet.
Additionally,
several departments such as streets and sewers have vehicles that always
operate as a crew. Other than the added safety of tracking 4 or 5 vehicles,
the amount of GPS units could be reduced to the main equipment, such as the
Sanitary Sewer Jet Truck, and removed from the additional support trucks.
City
of Lawrence Login Frequency by User in 2012