|
|
Public Works Dept. |
Memo
To: Commissioner David Schauner
Mike Wildgen
cc: David Corliss, Debbie Van Saun, Terese Gorman, Tammy Bennett
Commissioners Dennis Highberger, Sue Hack and David Dunfield
From: Chuck Soules
Date: June 2, 2004
Re: Engineering Services
This correspondence is to address Commissioner Schauner’s questions, to follow up on the Engineering Services memo, and to further identify potential projects that a limited engineering staff could complete. It is difficult to identify benefit district projects that the City could undertake because many of those projects are integral with other streets being proposed within a development. For example, the alignment of 16th Street was dependent on how the plat was developed. In contrast, a road such as Comet Lane (also a benefit district) could have been completed by an in-house staff.
Timing and scheduling may also be an issue. Many times several projects are being designed with similar schedules by different firms. This is not an issue that could not be managed with adequate planning and scheduling, but needs to be included in the consideration.
Currently staff does develop plans/specifications for several projects such as the KLINK Project, Phase I, II, III, and IV for the street maintenance program (mill, overlay, concrete repair/replacement and curb and gutter rehabilitation), very limited single traffic calming devices (circles), alley reconstruction, sidewalk replacement, and small drainage projects as time and workload permit.
Projects on the KDOT 5-Year Plan (O’Connell Road, Kasold Bridge, 31st Street, North 2nd and Locust Street) would be contracted. Additionally, projects such as Kasold Drive (15th to 23rd), Peterson Road (Kasold to west of Monterey Way), Queens Road (6th to Peterson) and George Williams Way would also be contracted. Projects such as these require two to three engineers and a full support staff. Additionally, these projects take months to develop. For the O’Connell Road project there were three engineers, a technician, and secretarial staff assigned to the project taking 3,024 hours to develop. The Kasold Road project is very similar, and four of the firms submitting a proposal had at least two engineers assigned to the project and a total of 2,500-3,000 hours to complete the design. These projects would consume most (if not all) of staff’s time and would not be efficient.
On the attached list, the highlighted projects could have been completed by an in-house staff. Explanations with respect to specialized training, extensive coordination with other improvements or development, and size are provided for other street projects.
Depending on staffing and Commission direction, certain other projects could be completed such as water, sewer and stormwater.
Attached is our estimated 5-year annual costs for staffing. Again, it is hard to speculate on various future projects. Some of the more recent projects that could be completed are:
Project Design Estimate
Harvard Road Traffic Calming $ 60,000
7th and Kentucky, Geometrics, and Signal 27,000
3rd Street, Alabama to Illinois 15,000
Naismith, 19th to 23rd 60,000
Wakarusa, widen to four lanes, 23rd to K-10 50,000
Other projects such as:
Estimated Engineering Cost
Traffic Calming/Control
Harvard & Wakarusa $ 50,000 - $75,000
Wakarusa & Legends 50,000 - $75,000
Neighborhood requests:
Pedestrian/bike facilities $ 10,000 - $20,000
Brick street reconstruction $ 60,000
If additional information is needed, please let me know.
Respectfully submitted,

Charles F. Soules, P.E.
Director of Public Works
CFS/je
Attachments