CHAPTER TWO - AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS

 

 

2.1      INTRODUCTION

 

Forecasts of aviation activity are the basis for determining airport facility requirements. These requirements are in turn used to plan future airport development such as tiedowns and apron area, hangar spaces, runway and taxiway lengths and pavement strength.

 

This chapter presents forecast of aviation demand at Lawrence Municipal Airport through the year 2020. Major subjects discussed in this chapter are: (1) historical and forecast population and economy of the region; (2)  historical and forecast general aviation traffic; and (3) forecast summary.

 

2.2     POPULATION AND ECONOMY OF THE LAWRENCE  REGION

 

Aviation demand at an airport is a function of the economic and demographic characteristics of the area served by the airport. Such an area is commonly referred to as the “airport service area”. An understanding of the present and likely future economy and population of the air service area is essential to the development of aviation demand forecasts.


Air Service Area

 

The community and surrounding areas served by an airport facility is referred to as an "airport service area". The size of a service area is normally determined by an airport's proximity to its users, its location in relation to physical boundaries such as mountains, forests and streams, by the quality of ground access to the facility and by its proximity to other airports which provide similar facilities and services, such as commercial service, comparable airfield capabilities, aircraft storage, security, fuel and maintenance.

 

The service area for the Lawrence Municipal Airport includes all of Douglas County and portions of Jefferson, Johnson, Leavenworth, Franklin, Miami and Shawnee counties in Kansas. It is estimated that although the service area line is closer to other airports, (see Table 2-1) Lawrence offers certain services, facilities or convenience appealing to potential users from surrounding counties.  Most of the communities within these counties have excellent access to Lawrence by way of Interstate 70 and U.S. Highway 24/40/59. (See Figure 2.1 "Airport Service Area" map).


Area Public-Use Airports

 

 

Table 2-1

Area Public-Use Airport Facilities

 

Airport Name

Distance/Direction

Runway Characteristics

Airport Services

To/From Kansas Raceway by Ground

Philip Ballard Municipal

20 NM W

4-22 3,002’ x 100’ Vis

13-31 5,099’x 150’ ILS

18-36 4,331’x 75’ NPI

Fuel, Major

Controlled

56.4 miles

65 minutes

Atchison Amelia Earhart

35 NM NE

16-34 3,000’ x 48’ Vis

Fuel (no jet Fuel), Major, Uncontrolled

50.2 miles

82 minutes

Topeka Forbes Field

21 NM WSW

3-21 7,001’ x 150 NPI

13-31 12,819’ x 150 ILS

Fuel, Major Controlled

61.8 miles

71 minutes

Gardner Municipal

17 NM SE

3-21 3,200’x 60’ Vis

8-26 2,960’ x 36 Vis

17-35 3,240’ x 90’ Vis

Fuel (no jet Fuel) Uncontrolled

32.2 miles

42 minutes

Ottawa Municipal

29 NM S

5-23 2,190’ x 86’ Turf

13-31 1,785’ x 95’ Turf

17-35 4,500’ x 75’ Vis

Fuel (no jet Fuel) Uncontrolled

57.5 miles

64 minutes

Sherman AAF (Joint-use)

27 NM NE

15-33  5,905’ x 100’ NPI

Fuel (no Jet fuel), Major, Uncontrolled

29.2 miles

53 minutes

New Century

20 NM SE

4-22 5,130’ x 100’ Vis

17-35 7,339’ x 190’ ILS

Fuel, Major Controlled

29.2 miles

34 minutes

Johnson County Executive

25 NM SE

18-36 4,099’ x 75’ NPI

Fuel, Major Controlled

25.3 miles

37 minutes

Miami County

32 NM SE

3-21 3,400’ x 60’ Vis

15-33 2,700’ x 55’ Turf

Fuel (no jet Fuel) Uncontrolled

48.6 miles

72 minutes

Kansas City Downtown

30 NM E

1-19 7,000 ‘ x 150’ ILS

3-21 5,052’ x 150’ ILS

Fuel, Major Controlled

9.9 miles

17 minutes

Kansas City International

30 NM NE

1L-19R 10,801’ x 150’ ILS

1R-19L 9,500’ x 150’ ILS

9-27 9,500’ x 150’ ILS

Fuel, Major Controlled

19.9 miles

26 minutes

Vis =No approach, visual only

NPI = Non Precision Approach

ILS = Precision Approach

Lawrence Airport is 20 miles and 26 minutes from Raceway

 

Lawrence Airport has many positive facilities and can be more competitive with some improvements.  The Lawrence airport compares favorably with other area airports with better services more convenience, better appeal to existing and potential users, and better access to the ground transportation system and no air traffic control tower. With the Kansas University business, Lawrence Airport makes better sense then to have to commute from Topeka or Kansas City. The KU Basketball team currently has to travel to Topeka due to the Regional Jets they use which needs more runway length and strength. Phase I devlopment will take care of this problem.

 

At the NBAA Trade Show in October 2000, Lawrence Aviation Advisory Board Chair Rick Bryant met with NASCAR flight officials regarding race track activities in 2001 for Kansas City. NASCAR officials acknowledged LWC as a viable operational site but were enthusiastic about the Federal Funding appropriations for runway extension, runway strengthening and apron expansion that would make Lawrence even more attract as a destination for race events. Since that conversation, NASCAR flight officials and race teams have phoned the FBO several times for updates on the airport projects. One race team has already made reservations to bring multiple jets to LWC for the inaugural NASCAR race in September 2001.

 

 

Population Trends

           

The population of Douglas County was 81,798 in 1990 and is now 101,459 in 2000, which figures out to a 24.0 percent increase for the ten-year period or 2.4 percent annually. The census data forecasts show the population is expected to continue to increase 39.2 percent over the next 20 years or nearly 4 percent per year. The table below shows forecasts for other counties in the airport service area which shows a growth of 15.0 percent over the past 20 years or 1.5 percent annually and projected growth of 26 percent over the next 20 years or 1.3 percent annually.


 

 

TABLE 2-2

POPULATION ESTIMATES OF SERVICE AREA COUNTIES

 

COUNTY

1990

2000

2010

2020

Douglas

81,798

101,459

121,377

141,294

Johnson

355,021

433,852

509,641

585,429

Leavenworth

64,393

73,749

83,061

92,373

Jefferson

15,960

18,058

20,213

22,368

Shawnee

160,976

178,528

195,873

213,218

Franklin

21,994

24,933

27,968

31,003

Miami

23,466

28,190

32,928

37,665

TOTALS

723,608

858,769

991,061

1,123,350

Source: Kansas Water Office, 1999

 

 


 

 

Figure 2.1 Airport Service Area

No Scale

 

 


2.3     AVIATION FORECASTS

 

The forecasts of aviation demand establish the nature and magnitude of aeronautical activity and the associated need for airport development for the ensuing 20-year planning period. History has repeatedly demonstrated that actual airport utilization will vary significantly, dependent upon the level of service provided the public and regional economic conditions which exist at any given moment. Due to the highly elastic nature of the aviation industry, most aviation forecasts tend to follow trends in growth rather than fluctuations in any given year.

 

The forecasts are provided in increments of five, ten and twenty years over the 20-year planning period. Year 2000 is the base forecast year, while 2020 is the final forecast year.

 

The basic aeronautical activity forecasts necessary to determine airport requirements and described herein include:

 

1.         Based Aircraft

2.                  Based Aircraft by Type

3.                  General Aviation Operations

4.                  General Aviation Operations by Type

5.                  Operations Mix

6.                  Peak Period Operations

7.         Instrument Operations

 


2.4     BASED AIRCRAFT

 

Currently, the based aircraft fleet at Lawrence consists of 55 airplanes. However, the airport currently has no available hangar space but does have a waiting list. If new hangars are constructed, it is estimated that this number would increase by 10 to 15. This growth in based aircraft can be attributed to the same growth in service area population and a robust regional economy.

 

Historical data for based aircraft at Lawrence is presented in Table 2-3. Figures from the FAA’s 5010 reports are shown.

 

TABLE 2-3

HISTORICAL BASED AIRCRAFT

 

YEAR

FAA’s 5010  Report

1990

52

1993

42

1995

50

1998

56

1999

53

 

After reviewing the historical trends and previously published forecasts, a growth rate of two percent was selected to determine the based aircraft study figures added to the artificial cap caused by lack of hangar space. This moderate growth rate was selected to account for the broad changes occurring in the general aviation industry. Based aircraft forecast figures are presented in Table 2-4. Based aircraft are forecast to increase from 55 in 2000 to 92 by the year 2020.


 

 

TABLE 2-4

FORECAST BASED AIRCRAFT

 

 

YEAR

 

AIRCRAFT

 

2000

 

55

 

2005

 

71

 

2010

 

79

 

2020

 

92

 

Source: ADG, Inc. 2000.

 

Congruous with the national trend towards larger, more sophisticated aircraft, the long-term (2020) mix forecast represents a divergence of the existing mix towards the national mix.

 

Table 2-5 presents this divergence of the existing mix towards the national mix.

 

 

TABLE 2-5

FORECAST BASED AIRCRAFT BY TYPE

 

 

 

YEAR

 

SINGLE

ENGINE

 

MULTI-

PISTON

 

MULTI-

TURBINE

 

BUSINESS

JET

 

 

ROTOR

 

 

TOTAL

2000

50

1

1

3

0

55

 

2005

 

62

 

2

 

2

 

4

 

1

 

71

 

2010

 

65

 

3

 

3

 

6

 

2

 

79

 

2020

 

71

 

4

 

4

 

10

 

3

 

92

 

Source: ADG, Inc. 2000.

 


2.5     GENERAL AVIATION OPERATIONS

 

An aircraft operation is defined as a takeoff or a landing. A touch-and-go (takeoff and landing) is counted as two operations. Historical data and previously published forecasts were evaluated in developing the study forecast figures. The historical data and previously published forecasts are presented in Table 2-6.

 

 

 

TABLE 2-6

GENERAL AVIATION OPERATIONAL TRENDS

 

YEAR

 

FAA5010 Reports

 

 

 

1990

 

29,400

 

 

 

1993

 

23,100

 

 

 

1995

 

24,600

 

 

 

1998

 

27,000

 

 

 

1999

 

31,350

 

 

 

Contrary to the fact that general aviation growth has leveled off and small, single-engine aircraft production and sales have slowed, it is anticipated that nonscheduled GA operations will increase. It is believed that existing aircraft utilization will rise as a result of aircraft owners’ efforts to maintain and increase levels of cost effective flight. Hence, nonscheduled operations should rise also.

 

Historically, the number of general aviation operations at Lawrence has averaged 570 annual operations per based aircraft, for the ten-year-period 1990 - 2000. This forecast will use 550 operations per based aircraft for the projections.

 

The results of the study generated forecast are presented in Table 2-7. The number of general aviation operations is expected to increase from 31,350 in 2000 to 50,600 by the year 2020. It should be noted that air charter and military operations have been included in general aviation (nonscheduled) operations.

 

 

 

TABLE 2-7

FORECAST GENERAL AVIATION OPERATIONS

 

 

 

YEAR

 

GA OPERATIONS

 

2000

 

31,350

 

2005

 

39,000

 

2010

 

43,450

 

2020

 

50,600

 

Source: ADG, Inc. 2000. Includes Air Taxi and Military Operations

 

 

 

 

 

2.6     GENERAL AVIATION OPERATIONS BY TYPE

 

Although production and sales of single-engine aircraft have shown "signs of life" since 1989, the general trend underway in the general aviation fleet is towards a heavier and more sophisticated aircraft fleet. It is anticipated that during the study period this trend will continue and the percentage of fleet operations accomplished by piston aircraft will decrease while the percentage of operations by multi-turbine, business jet and rotor aircraft will increase. Since the forecast in FAA Aviation Forecasts, Fiscal Years 1999-2010 is only presented for hours flown and not aircraft operations, a direct application of the figures given could not be utilized. However, a correlation of the percentages could be computed and used.

 

A breakdown of the forecast of general aviation operations by aircraft type is presented in Table 2-8.


 

 

 

TABLE 2-8

GENERAL AVIATION OPERATIONS BY AIRCRAFT TYPE

 

 

YEAR

 

SINGLE ENGINE

 

MULTI PISTON

 

MULTI TURBINE

 

BUSINESS JET

 

 

ROTOR

 

 

TOTAL

 

2000

 

17,750

 

3,150

 

5,650

 

4,700

 

100

 

31,350

 

2005

 

22,050

 

3,900

 

7,000

 

5,850

 

200

 

39,000

 

2010

 

24,550

 

4,300

 

7,800

 

6,500

 

300

 

43,450

 

2020

 

28,450

 

5,050

 

9,100

 

7,600

 

400

 

50,600

 

Source: ADG, Inc. 2000.

 

2.7     OPERATIONS BY AIRCRAFT MIX

 

The operational aircraft mix is classified into two broad types of operations:  local or itinerant. A local operation is defined as a takeoff or landing performed by an aircraft that:

 

1.         operates in the local traffic pattern or within sight of the airport; or

 

2.         is known to be departing for or arriving from flights in local practice areas located within a 20 nautical mile radius of the airport; or,

 

3.         executes simulated instrument approaches or low passes at the airport.

 

An itinerant operation is defined as all aircraft operations other than local operations, which includes all scheduled service operations.

 

The operational mix of local/itinerant traffic at all U.S. airports with FAA air traffic control service is presented in FAA Aviation Forecast, Fiscal Years 1999 - 2010. Although Lawrence does not have a control tower, the current local/itinerant mix is similar to the national average local/itinerant mix. This is based on airport records compiled by staff at the facility. Historically, over the past ten years (1990 - 2000), traffic at Lawrence has averaged 60 percent local and 40 percent itinerant. Future traffic is assumed to follow national trends. A summary of the forecast mix is presented in Table 2-9.

 

 

 

TABLE 2-9

FORECAST OPERATIONS MIX

 

 

 

 

YEAR

 

 

TOTAL

OPERATIONS

 

LOCAL

 

ITINERANT

 

OPERATIONS

 

PERCENT

 

OPERATIONS

 

PERCENT

 

2000  

 

31,350

 

18,810

 

60%

 

12,540

 

40%

 

2005  

 

39,000

 

22,230

 

57%

 

16,770

 

43%

 

2010  

 

43,450

 

24,330

 

56%

 

19,120

 

44%

 

2020  

 

50,600

 

27,830

 

55%

 

22,770

 

45%

 

Source: ADG, Inc. 2000. Includes All Operations

 

 

2.8     PEAK PERIOD OPERATIONS

 

Peak day is defined as the average number of operations per day during the most active month. In the FAA Central Region and at Lawrence, the most active month normally accounts for approximately 10 percent of the total annual operations. Lastly, approximately 15 percent of the peak day operations occur during the peak hour. Total peak period operations, which include all general aviation operations, are presented in Table 2-10.

 

 

TABLE 2-10

PEAK PERIOD FORECAST – TOTAL OPERATIONS

 

 

YEAR

 

TOTAL OPERATIONS

 

PEAK MONTH

 

PEAK

 DAY

 

PEAK

HOUR

 

2000

 

31,350

 

3,135

 

100

 

15

 

2005

 

39,000

 

3,900

 

120

 

              18

 

2010

 

43,450

 

4,345

 

130

 

20

 

2020

 

50,600

 

5,060

 

160

 

24

 

Source: ADG, Inc. 2000.

 

 


2.9     INSTRUMENT OPERATIONS

 

Typically, annual instrument operations at a general aviation airport include those operations conducted by air taxi, military, and a portion of the general aviation traffic. For this study analysis, it was assumed that 25 percent of the general aviation itinerant operations are conducted under an IFR flight plan. Therefore, the number of annual instrument operations is projected to increase from 3,135 in 2000 to 5,700 in 2020.